[oor-dev] OOR
Peter Yim
peter.yim at cim3.com
Fri Jan 22 21:13:57 CET 2016
Ken, Michael, et al.,
Ontolog Forum is a virtual community.
OOR is a joint project.
IAOA has a technical committee on "Ontology Registries and Repositories."
While they have somewhat overlap objectives, they are different
initiatives. Until now, we have kept them separate (although Ontolog Forum
has been hosting the OOR wiki site, and (since Jul-2014),
TillMossakowski-University of Magdeburg (OGVU.DE) has been hosting the OOR
mailing list.
I am hoping that the OOR project will continue and resume activities. At
that point, the core players can decide how to proceed going forward. ... I
will do my best to support your joint decision(s). Just let me know.
Regards. =ppy
--
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:00 PM, kenb <kenb at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> I have full permission on ontologforum.org if you feel that it would be
> suitable for hosting this page.
>
> -- Ken
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Peter Yim wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
>> Fantastic!
>>
>> In the past, I've been developing the webpage and the dns config, and
>> Shinya Yamada (copied here) has been doing the apache configurations.
>>
>> I will put this on the agenda when I meet with Shinya early next week and
>> get back to you afterwards.
>>
>> In the mean time, it would be great if you can,
>>
>> 1. host the current http://oor.net page at a server of your choice. You
>> would want it on a server where you or your sysadmin have full permission
>> to configure apache. ... please advise IP
>> address of that server.
>>
>> 2. identify your technical contact(s), so we can start a mail thread to
>> work through the details to get this transfer done.
>>
>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>> --
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 22, 2016, Michael Gruninger <gruninger at mie.utoronto.ca>
>> wrote:
>> Hello Peter,
>> I can host the oor.net index page and run the proxy configuration.
>> What do I need to know?
>>
>> thanks,
>> michael
>>
>> On 15-12-17 4:34 PM, Peter Yim wrote:
>> (re-directing this conversation to all OOR stewards and
>> developers)
>> ... please pick up the conversation from here. The
>> solicitation goes
>> to everyone who is willing. =ppy
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Michael & All,
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Michael.
>>
>> Great! I will include the OOR.NET re-direction/proxy-service
>> in our
>> to-do list in my final lag of the transition from our
>> existing servers
>> at the datacenter, to our long-term historic archival
>> servers. (...
>> Although, for the time being, this is not at the top of the
>> priority
>> list.)
>>
>> While I will retain control of the zone authority (dns
>> services) on
>> the OOR.NET domain, I will be happy if anyone is willing
>> take over the
>> hosting of the OOR.NET index page (something similar to what
>> we
>> have/had at: http://oor.net ) and to run the apache mod_proxy
>> configuration which was how we implemented the OOR.NET
>> re-direction/proxy-service for the various repositories (of
>> course,
>> whoever that is, can choose to implement it differently as
>> well). That
>> way, future configuration changes will not have to go through
>> me/CIM3.
>> ... Anyone? (ShinyaYamda or I, at CIM3, can help with getting
>> that
>> going.)
>>
>>
>> Best regards. =ppy
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Michael Gruninger
>> <gruninger at mie.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> Hello Peter,
>> yes, we should continue the OOR initiative, considering
>> all of the work with
>> OntoHub and COLORE.
>>
>> - michael
>>
>>
>> On 15-12-17 11:29 AM, Peter Yim wrote:
>> Dear Michael, Till, Ken,
>>
>> Further to my last msg (below):
>> [ppy] yes, if people decide to continue on
>> with the OOR initiative. I do
>> hope you and Till might take the lead and
>> revive that initiative. ...
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thoughts!?
>>
>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Peter Yim <peter.yim at cim3.com>
>> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> what is the final outcome of the
>> migration/changeover of OOR-related
>> issues?
>>
>> [ppy] because of other more critical issues, as well as
>> my travels, I still
>> have not had the chance to fix the "oor redirect" issue
>> yet; sorry. However,
>> I have updated the http://oor.net index site to link
>> people to the right
>> repository locations.
>>
>> In particular, will you still be managing the
>> aliasing of the oor.net
>> headers?
>>
>> [ppy] yes, if people decide to continue on with the OOR
>> initiative. I do
>> hope you and Till might take the lead and revive that
>> initiative. ...
>> Thoughts? [Michael, Till, Ken]
>> (... But if there is not enough desire or momentum to
>> continue that, I'd
>> probably just sell that domain name and recover some of
>> the investment . It
>> took me years, some luck, a lot of effort and thousands
>> of dollars then,
>> before I was able to buy that domain name. )
>>
>> As a reminder, we need to change the header for
>> COLORE ...
>>
>> [ppy] Thanks. Is the http://oor.net index site
>> pointing people to the right
>> location for you now?
>>
>> Best regards. =ppy
>> --
>>
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2015 9:07 AM, "Michael Gruninger" <
>> gruninger at mie.utoronto.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>> what is the final outcome of the
>> migration/changeover of OOR-related
>> issues?
>> In particular, will you still be managing the
>> aliasing of the oor.net
>> headers?
>>
>> As a reminder, we need to change the header for
>> COLORE
>> from the old googlecode header
>>
>> https://code.google.com/p/colore/source/browse/trunk/ontologies/
>> to the GitHub header:
>>
>> https://github.com/gruninger/colore/blob/master/ontologies/
>>
>> thanks,
>> michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.ovgu.de/pipermail/oor-dev/attachments/20160122/4147096d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the oor-dev
mailing list