[oor-dev] Fwd: OOR

[Till Mossakowski]

Dear all,

we continuously improve Ontohub.org; a new feature is that now proofs 
are possible. The next step is to improve the user interface, which is 
still a bit clumsy at various points.

Best, Till

Am 17.12.2015 um 22:34 schrieb Peter Yim:
> (re-directing this conversation to all OOR stewards and developers)
> ... please pick up the conversation from here. The solicitation goes
> to everyone who is willing. =ppy
>
>
>
> Dear Michael & All,
>
>
> Thanks, Michael.
>
> Great! I will include the OOR.NET re-direction/proxy-service in our
> to-do list in my final lag of the transition from our existing servers
> at the datacenter, to our long-term historic archival servers. (...
> Although, for the time being, this is not at the top of the priority
> list.)
>
> While I will retain control of the zone authority (dns services) on
> the OOR.NET domain, I will be happy if anyone is willing take over the
> hosting of the OOR.NET index page (something similar to what we
> have/had at: http://oor.net ) and to run the apache mod_proxy
> configuration which was how we implemented the OOR.NET
> re-direction/proxy-service for the various repositories (of course,
> whoever that is, can choose to implement it differently as well). That
> way, future configuration changes will not have to go through me/CIM3.
> ... Anyone? (ShinyaYamda or I, at CIM3, can help with getting that
> going.)
>
>
> Best regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Michael Gruninger
> <gruninger at mie.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> Hello Peter,
>> yes, we should continue the OOR initiative, considering all of the work with
>> OntoHub and COLORE.
>>
>> - michael
>
>> On 15-12-17 11:29 AM, Peter Yim wrote:
>>> Dear Michael, Till, Ken,
>>>
>>> Further to my last msg (below):
>>>> [ppy] yes, if people decide to continue on with the OOR initiative. I do
>>>> hope you and Till might take the lead and revive that initiative. ...
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> Thoughts!?
>>>
>>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Peter Yim <peter.yim at cim3.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>>> what is the final outcome of the migration/changeover of OOR-related
>>> issues?
>> [ppy] because of other more critical issues, as well as my travels, I still
>> have not had the chance to fix the "oor redirect" issue yet; sorry. However,
>> I have updated the http://oor.net index site to link people to the right
>> repository locations.
>>
>>> In particular, will you still be managing the aliasing of the oor.net
>>> headers?
>> [ppy] yes, if people decide to continue on with the OOR initiative. I do
>> hope you and Till might take the lead and revive that initiative. ...
>> Thoughts? [Michael, Till, Ken]
>> (... But if there is not enough desire or momentum to continue that,  I'd
>> probably just sell that domain name and recover some of the investment . It
>> took me years, some luck, a lot of effort and thousands of dollars then,
>> before I was able to buy that domain name. )
>>
>>> As a reminder, we need to change the header for COLORE ...
>> [ppy] Thanks. Is the http://oor.net index site pointing people to the right
>> location for you now?
>>
>> Best regards. =ppy
>> --
>
>> On Dec 8, 2015 9:07 AM, "Michael Gruninger" <gruninger at mie.utoronto.ca>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Peter,
>>> what is the final outcome of the migration/changeover of OOR-related
>>> issues?
>>> In particular, will you still be managing the aliasing of the oor.net
>>> headers?
>>>
>>> As a reminder, we need to change the header for COLORE
>>> from the old googlecode header
>>> https://code.google.com/p/colore/source/browse/trunk/ontologies/
>>> to the GitHub header:
>>> https://github.com/gruninger/colore/blob/master/ontologies/
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> michael