[ontoiop-forum] "Dataset description" paper about the OntoIOp registry submitted: questions about license and API4KB
Christoph LANGE
math.semantic.web at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 21:21:36 CEST 2014
Hi Peter,
Peter Yim on 2014-10-08 21:33:
> > [CL] ... so two reasonable ones remain ... [ ODC 1.0 or CC0]
>
> [ppy] besides those two, one might also consider "CC BY 4.0" - see:
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
For data, the normal CC licenses are rather being advised against.
I didn't exactly know why. However I found help here:
http://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/26/benefits-of-using-cc0-over-cc-by-for-data
http://www.canadensys.net/2012/why-we-should-publish-our-data-under-cc0
(specifically addresses CC-BY).
In a nutshell: For data, licenses that were not designed for data, have
impractical constraints.
CC0 is actually more of a waiver than a license; it basically says "do
whatever you want with the data".
ODC-By, like CC-BY, requires attribution, which may lead to the problem
of "attribution stacking" when republishing derivatives of data based on
a republication of derivatives of other data. However, the attribution
requirement of ODC-By is easier to satisfy than that of CC-BY. CC-BY
says that "you must provide the name of the creator and attribution
parties, a copyright notice, a license notice, a disclaimer notice, and
a link to the material". ODC-By makes this a lot simpler: you only have
to refer to the _dataset_ by name, e.g. "Contains information from the
OntoIOp Registry (http://purl.net/dol/registry) which is made available
under the ODC Attribution License".
I personally prefer CC0. CC0 makes it easiest to reuse our data, and we
certainly want to promote the reuse of our data. ODC-By has the
advantage of advertising our dataset, but OTOH we are deploying the
OntoIOp Registry as a _linked_ open dataset, in which particularly every
item has a link back to the top level of the dataset. Plus, the OntoIOp
Registry URIs (e.g. http://purl.net/dol/logics/SROIQ) will soon point to
Ontohub, where human visitors won't see RDF/XML but shiny HTML. Ontohub
currently advertises the OOR in its page footer; maybe it could also say
"powered by OntoIOp".
Cheers,
Christoph
--
Christoph Lange, Enterprise Information Systems Department
Applied Computer Science @ University of Bonn; Fraunhofer IAIS
http://langec.wordpress.com/about, Skype duke4701
→ Postdoc position on Linked Data / Enterprise Information Integration
with the EIS group at Uni Bonn & Fraunhofer IAIS (Bonn, Germany)
http://eis.iai.uni-bonn.de/Jobs – apply until 7 November
More information about the ontoiop-forum
mailing list