[ontoiop-forum] DOL standard: final draft for proofreading, Section 6

[Bock, Conrad]

P.S. Sections 6.1 and 6.3 should be moved to Section 0.  The adopted
document (after Section 0 is removed) shouldn't have authorship info
in it.

Conrad


-----Original Message-----
From: Bock, Conrad 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 11:01 AM
To: ontoiop-forum at ovgu.de
Subject: RE: [ontoiop-forum] [DOL] general proof reading (#74), Section 0

 >  Are you sure? I went through several standards and while most of them
 >  just mention companies, there were one or two which recognized
 >  individuals as contributers.

Not sure about OMG rules in this case, but the practice is that OMG
members as a whole who requested and are adopting this.  It isn't supposed
to be attributed to individuals who wrote it.  It's like buildings with
the owner's name on it, not the contractors who built it.

Conrad


-----Original Message-----
From: Bock, Conrad 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 8:23 AM
To: 'tillmo/DOL'; 'OntoIOp open discussion'
Subject: RE: [DOL] general proof reading (#74), Section 0

 >  in the most recent version, there is a complete section 0. See
 >  https://github.com/tillmo/DOL , there is a reference to the document in
 >  PDF form.

Looks good.  Except Sections 6.1 and 6.3 should be moved to Section 0.  The
adopted document (after Section 0 is removed) shouldn't have authorship info
in it.

Conrad