<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<tt>
<b>Chat transcript from room: oor_20140722</b><br>
<b>2014-07-22 GMT-08:00</b><br>
<b>[07:03] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>wiki page:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ontolog-02.cim3.net/wiki/OOR_Conference_2014_07_22">http://ontolog-02.cim3.net/wiki/OOR_Conference_2014_07_22</a>
Skype: join.conference when prompted enter Conference ID: 843758#<br>
<b>[07:17] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>slides also available at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~mossakow/2014-07-22_Ontohub_API.pdf">http://iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~mossakow/2014-07-22_Ontohub_API.pdf</a><br>
<b>[07:19] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>Does the generated
specification depend on the coding language?<br>
<b>[07:28] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>So a query is not treated
as an object?<br>
<b>[07:30] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>The description of
ontologysearch is not clear to me.<br>
<b>[07:31] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>slide 13...<br>
<b>[07:34] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>What is the context of the
APIs? Instances of ontohub (i.e., inter-ontohub)? End users? Both?<br>
<b>[07:36] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>Are 'accepts', 'registers
with', 'informs' API commands?<br>
<b>[07:37] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>How does 'reliance' handle
end-point or communication failures?<br>
<b>[07:41] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Todd: does the API cover
authentification? Tim: yes, using an authorization token approach.<br>
<b>[07:42] </b><b>MikeBennett: </b>This might be a naive
question: can these API commands be executed from the command
line? So that for instance a scheduling tool like Jenkins could
invoke them?<br>
<b>[07:45] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Tim's answer: yes.<br>
<b>[07:46] </b><b>MikeBennett: </b>Can you search on ontology
imports i.e. get a result showing how ontologies import from one
another?<br>
<b>[07:46] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Todd: Does the generated
specification depend on the coding language? Tim: we use ruby, and
the DSL will be based on ruby.<br>
<b>[07:51] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Tim: in the API,
ontology-related queries use the IRI of the ontology, followed by
a command. Other queries consist of just the command. In both
cases, there may be additional parameters.<br>
<b>[07:51] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Todd: why constrain this
prefixing approach just to ontologies?<br>
<b>[07:52] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Todd: the general
approach to use a IRI as a prefix that gives the context to the
subsequent command is interesting.<br>
<b>[07:53] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Todd: the prefix approach
could be used for any resource (text files, image files, ...), not
just ontologies.<br>
<b>[07:54] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>Can imports be considered
as a 'type' of [ontology] mapping?<br>
<b>[07:55] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Mike: Can you search on
ontology imports i.e. get a result showing how ontologies import
from one another? Tim: this would be a textual representation of
the ontology graph. Would be interesting to add this.<br>
<b>[07:57] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>Would it make sense to
include a 'resource type' as part of the prefix?<br>
<b>[07:57] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Tim: until now, we
compute all query answers on the fly, later on, caching will be
needed.<br>
<b>[07:57] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Tim: imports are a kind
of ontology mapping.<br>
<b>[07:58] </b><b>RaviSharma: </b>thanks for answering search
during import on the fly.<br>
<b>[08:00] </b><b>MikeBennett: </b>I have to drop off now<br>
<b>[08:01] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Todd: Would it make sense
to include a 'resource type' as part of the prefix? Tim: yes, we
should think about this, to prefix or postfix the IRI with the
type, in order to ensure that the command is relevant in the given
context.<br>
<b>[08:04] </b><b>ToddSchneider: </b>Thank you.<br>
<b>[08:04] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Agreement: in a few
weeks, have will a follow-up meeting, with discussion of more
details.<br>
<b>[08:04] </b><b>RaviSharma: </b>thanks<br>
<b>[08:05] </b><b>TillMossakowski: </b>Next week: general OOR
strategy discussion.<br>
<b>[08:05] </b><b>TimReddehase: </b>Thank you all for the
suggestions and revealing questions.<br>
<b>[08:05] </b>List of attendees: Gary Berg-Cross,
MichaelGruninger, MikeBennett, MikeDean, RaviSharma,
TillMossakowski, Tim, TimReddehase, ToddSchneider<br>
</tt>
</body>
</html>